For Pierre Poilievre, the conflict appears to be the point
Hyperbole has probably existed for as long as humans have been able to communicate. And some amount of conflict is inherent to democracy. But has any Canadian politician in recent memory embraced rhetorical conflict as enthusiastically as Pierre Poilievre?
Hyperbole has probably existed for as long as humans have been able to communicate. And some amount of conflict is inherent to democracy. But has any Canadian politician in recent memory embraced rhetorical conflict as enthusiastically as Pierre Poilievre?